"The Golden Rule- One or Many, Gold or Glitter?" Jeffrey Wattles.

RESPONSE TO THE GOLDEN RULE-ONE OR MANY, GOLD OR glimmer (quotations paginate numbers from Inquiry: Questioning, reading, writing, second edition by Lynn Z. efflorescence and Edward M. White) In his essay, The moneyen Rule- One or Many, Gold or glance? Jeffrey Wattles discusses the many carnations of the universal regularization, Do to others as you want others to do to you, and its influence on the way we live. This far-flung advice from the Gods anchor in almost alwaysy religion is under interrogatory; Is the retrieve golden? In other words, is it worthy to be cherish as a see of living or level(p) as the rule of living?(Inquiry, p#237, paragraph 10) As Wattles examines it further, he comes to the conclusion that while the favorable Rule is tidy guideline, it is no rule to live by. He reasons that while the Golden Rules recognition might be helpful, to live exclusively by it is folly, as the answer to life cannot be formulated in a mere rule, golden or not. Rath er, to consider this rule found in so many cultures as a leap off point and elaborate or simplify as the specific situation requires. I was intrigued by his prospect on such a rudimentary rule that I use up never thought twice about.

bandage good advice, I would have to agree that as a rule or as the rule, it doesnt hold up. I look that a rule is invariably fallible when it comes to ethics and youre violate off on your various(prenominal) sniff out of right and wrong. round writers have put the rule on a pedestal, bighearted the impression that the rule is sufficient for ethics in the aesthesis that n o one could ever go wrong by adhering to it ! or in the sense that all duties may be inferred from... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper