Misunderstandings Communication Essay

Who was the vector?Both Co-OwnersWho was the receiver?EmployeesWhat was the message?No bonuses for the approaching yearWhat channel was used to throw the message?A memoWhat was the misunderstanding that occurred?The memo discussed the profit sales from memo What we think and what the gild can do, based on generated profit, are two different things. In fiscal year 2010, we experienced bad debt of $2,681.39 on sales of $1,900,030.89. At this efflorescence, we take up bad debt of $9,050.45 on projected sales of $2,200,000.00. The misunderstanding is because thither are only eight employees and the company did non admit a great loss that would hinder bonuses. Considering that the projected sales ($2.2 million) at the point of the memo was through 10/15/2011. How could the misunderstanding have been avoided?By non sharing with ALL eight (8) employees the cost of sales and not think there were no finance minded people in the group.1. What did you learn about the communicating pro cess from this activity? That communication essential be clear and it should invariably have a argument and a conclusion. 2. What seemed to be the main causes of the misunderstandings? The sputter to cover up the real rationalness for not granting the bonus to the employees. And, the argument in which the owner stated was not a rightful conclusion. 3. What tips can you bespeak for preventing misunderstandings in communication? To unceasingly make sure that the claim is something that the truth can be found.Who was the sender?CFO/Male co-ownerWho was the receiver?Employees/Female Co-ownerWhat was the message?No CODs to be portrayed without payment unless approved by CFO What channel was used to send the message?A memoWhat was the misunderstanding that occurred?That everyone, front office and talking to driver, understood the rule but the female co-owner would go behind everyone and deliver product anyway not getting the payment leaving the employees to suffer the wrath of th e CFO regarding the unpaid delivery. How could the misunderstanding have been avoided?If the female co-owner would have paid upfront the delivery that she was making for the customer or alone abides by the same rules as everyone else for the benefit of the company.1. What did you learn about the communication process from this activity? That communication must be clear and it should always have a argument and a conclusion. 2. What seemed to be the main causes of the misunderstandings? The struggle of power between the co-owners that caused employees the inability to do a job. 3. What tips can you suggest for preventing misunderstandings in communication? To always make sure that the claim is something that the truth can be found.