Did Black Power Groups Harm The Struggle For Civil Rights?

Did moody designer groups harm the struggle for courteous rights? after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Act of 1965 it seemed as though those who advocated amicable protests had got what they wanted. The government passed laws which theoretically gave black people an equal standing with bloodlessn people. However, in reality discrimination was st lightheaded rife in many an(prenominal) parts of America and the majority of black people lived in poverty, a hard condition to break out of.It can be utter that Black world-beater groups actually overhauled Martin Luther powers passive electric resistance policy as people didnt want to reenforcement military force and mightinesss less controversial methods were then able to supplication to a wider group. However, Black top executive groups can also be diabolical for harming the struggle for civil rights. Two contrasting groups were both fighting against the ill treatment of black people and Americans were made to choose who to support.With Black Power groups using such violent methods many turned to Martin Luther King and began to support him. Having groups using physical force and demanding unrealistic changes suddenly made Kings methods seem much much attractive and his aims far more reasonable. Nonetheless, Kings tactics were proving slow to procure any drastic changes and particularly in the North, Midwest and West, black Americans had gained little from Kings Civil Right Movement.Groups turning to effect to obtain results sent a message to the Americans that something should be done about the economic and social release that black people faced. Black Power groups brought a sense of rob in being black and in the beginning during fundraising Black Power was able to shed an impact in many different areas of America, they helped in the ghettos which had not felt Kings influence and provide help for pitiable school children.However, seeing black people using violence only cemented s ome Americans views of black people being inferior to whites. They saying the brute force being applied by Black Power groups as typical for every black person and thus were backward to guide any rights to black people. The use of violence may wee even brought back Kings own movement, in white peoples eyes he was tainted by association, they move black people all in the same class.The ghetto riots between 1964-1968 hindered the civil rights movement, black people fought among themselves and there were hundreds at fatalities and thousands of arrests and injuries, the government was loath to give rights to the people who had caused such devastation in America. The relative unity that King had created within the Civil Rights Movement during the Freedom Rides was disrupted by the arrangement of Black Power groups, this hampered the movement as previously all the groups had been working(a) together toward a mutual goal.Black Power groups did not really have defined aims, leaders s uch as Carmichael were constantly changing their ideas going people unsure as to what Black Power groups were actually protesting against. In conclusion, Martin Luther Kings policy of passive resistance and using savour as a weapon were not producing the results that black people wanted, poor people especially found it hard to relate to King as he was well-off, those living in ghettos responded more to the philosophy of Black Power.The example high ground that King had worked so hard to obtain was tattered by Black Power and their idea that white people were inferior. Black Power groups enabled people to realise that something had to be done about the level of injustice that black people faced and although their methods were questionable it cannot be denied that they produced results.