Questions On David Crystal Essay

Questions on David lechatelierites article 2b or Not 2b? 1. David Crystal begins his article with several(prenominal) strong they say arguments, quoting writers who argue that text messaging is destroying the English speech. At what acme in the article do you begin to see that his make prospect is very different from that of such critics? Crystals perspective on texting is displayed many times throughout different paragraphs in the article. In paragraph six Crystal states texting has added a new dimension to language use. Although there are some who see texting as a moderne tool that is ruining proper English, Crystal sees it as a way for society to enhance thee language skills. 2. Summarize Crystals arguments in favor of text messaging. In what ways wee-wee the dangers of this phenomenon been immensely overstated, in his opinion? How does he organize his argument? What are his master(prenominal) points, and what kinds of reliever does he offer? Most arguments state that te xt abbreviations have replaced proper English. On the other hand, Crystal states that these abbreviations go back to centuries. For physical exercise IOU goes back to 1618 A book written by Eric Partritch in 1942 called vocabulary of Abbreviations contained sms examples and was published 50 years before texting. 3. Crystal wrote this article for a British newspaper read primarily by adults. What might he have done differently if the piece had been for, say, an audience of middle or high civilize students? If Crystals audience were middle school students he might have written this article from there point of view . Crystal would most likely include more examples that could interest to them. Also, Crystal could include how texting can help with school and be an plus rather than a distraction. 4. Reread the two text message poems in the article. Which one do you prefer? In what ways do these poems support his argument? The second poem supports Crystals argument, because the autho r foreshorten words and replaced letters with numbers just as most mass who text do. Although the author has written the poem differently the reader is unsoundedable to interpret the poem and the words makes sense.