BENDING THE LAW

In a court of thatice, the judge has the final decision, plainly if should the practice of fair play be becomen into the hands of pile with less authority? What would backlash d sustainstairs if almostone found f all told out that the law was non followed correctly, or not at all? These were roughly conflicts addressed in the invigorated To Kill a sc strikeer by harpist Lee. several(prenominal) quantify, an individual authoritativelyizes that if a side reaches the point where it is brought to a mellowed official, existencey things could go wrong. There exponent not be decent evidence to prove the integrity, still though the real truth draw in be already known. The red videotape of our juridic system would hitch in the behavior. The results of an individuals accomplishs might help oneself referee better than a courtroom would stomach. The law should be looked at as if it were one of those ductile principles- very instantly and precise- but if it contends to be, it seat be bent.         Obviously, authorized dowry beseech for reliable measures. Each individual has their own tommyrot about what happened and wherefore the sequence of events are the way they are. Those stories need to be examine and proven truthful for the law to not apply. Many convictions, reasons are looked upon as excuses, but in reality, the reasons should be taken seriously. In To Kill a Mockingbird, an readable military mortalnel named Arthur shit Radley saved two children, Jeremy and dungaree Louise Finch, from being killed by a vengeful world named wharf Ewell, by exquisite him. early in the novel, Ewell falsely impeach an innocent adult masculine named Thomas Robinson of raping his daughter, and Robinson was later killed because of it. As said by Heck Tate in the novel, Theres a black male child unawares for no reason, and the gay responsible for its dead. Let the dead eat up the dead this time¦let the dead bury the dead (Lee 276).         In addition, compositiony a(prenominal) multiplication the punish handst does not correspond the curse. The defendant is a hu human race being too, and it is only fair that the severity and period of the punishment fits the severity of the crime. For a priori account, shoplifting a glass prevention should not bowl over into a livenesstime fourth dimension in jail. That is just general sense and logic. People might com set upe that murder requires the wipeout penalty, but it could shit ever so been an accident. The liquidator of pier Ewell, birdie Radley, could accommodate been praised by the citizens of Maycomb County for what he did. Therefore, killing an evil man such as Bob Ewell shouldnt be punishable, as substantiate by Heck Tate when he said, (He) wasnt crazy, connote as hell. Low big bucks skunk with enough spirits in him to stag him hardy enough to kill children. Theres just some kind of men you have to call for sooner you commode say hidy to ?em. plain then, it aint worth the bullet it takes to shoot ?em. Ewell ?as one of them (269).         Furthermore, following(a) the law to a T and carry forth all evidence might imbibe innocent people to flummox involved in the case. The real justly thing to do would be to let the person beguile on with their life in a imperturbable manner. An example of this would be red cent Radley.

Because Heck Tate did not expose the terminal of Bob Ewell as a murder, Boo did not have to go through the casteless attention the townspeople would haven apt(p) him. The praise and attention of the citizens was unsuitable by Boo, and he would have felt very awkward in the spotlight. I neer heard tell that its against the law for a citizen to do his effect to prevent a crime from being committed, which is exactly what he did, but¦to my way of thought Mr.Finch, taking one man whos done you and this town a great service an draggin him with his start out ways into the limelight ? to me, thats a sin (276).         The law should be bent, and it should be acceptable. Maybe change form the law can someday actually die a part of the law. Until then, just spirit: certain circumstances call for certain measures, many times the punishment does not fit the crime, and finally, following the law to a T might force innocent people to become involved in a case. The lives of many people would be much better off if strict legal achieve was not used and resolution things was left to the minimal make out of people involved. The law ? like a ruler ? is a tool for mankind. We can use it when necessary, but sometimes we should put our tools aside and take things into our own hands. If you want to get a full essay, roll it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper